2026 EdTech Evidence Report
Screen time questions are turning into screen time policy. Boards, families, and now states want proof that classroom technology actually helps students learn, not just a promise that it might.
The 2026 EdTech Evidence Report reviewed 150 widely used tools and found a clear gap: research, privacy, and accessibility standards cluster in purpose-built edtech, not the consumer apps that end up in classrooms anyway. Read on to learn where the gaps are widest.
What the 2026 EdTech Evidence Report covers
Instructure and InnovateEDU reviewed 150 of the most-used K-12 classroom technologies from fall 2025, sorting them into purpose-built edtech and general consumer technology, then checking each against research and quality benchmarks districts increasingly require. The report lays out the following:
- Maps every tool against Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) evidence levels I through IV, showing how much classroom technology actually has evidence behind it
- Compares data privacy and interoperability certifications, including iKeepSafe, 1EdTech, and Project Unicorn, across edtech and consumer technology
- Reviews accessibility and usability standards, including Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) alignment and Voluntary Product Accessibility Templates (VPATs)
- Lays out a four-phase path for consumer technology companies to build the evidence and certifications schools expect
- Gives states and districts eight procurement questions to use immediately when evaluating a new tool
Districts are formalizing procurement, and the tools that can show their work are the ones that will hold up under review. (And for inquiring minds: Canvas by Instructure remains the only learning management system with ESSA Level III research behind it!)
Research Reports
The EdTech Top 40: K-12 EdTech Engagement During the 2025-26 School Year
Research Reports
Mastery Predictive Assessments: Multi-State Predictive Validity Report 2025
Research Reports