Blog

Martin Bean on Unlearning and the Future of Human Capital

student on cell phone
replace_image.jpg

 

For Professor Martin Bean, the journey through the world of education has been a "career in three innings". From leading global education products at Microsoft to serving as Vice-Chancellor and President of The Open University in the UK and RMIT University in Australia, Bean has witnessed the tectonic shifts in how we learn and work. Now, through his think tank, The Bean Centre, he focuses on a singular, vital mission: helping institutions and individuals stay relevant in a world defined by turbulence.

Bean’s philosophy is grounded in two contrasting memories from his own student days. The first was discovering the "experiential learning cycle," which became his lifelong blueprint for turning information into meaningful knowledge. The second was a crushing interaction with a microeconomics professor who failed him despite reading what he called the "best real-world answer" to an exam. The reason? "Microeconomics has nothing to do with the real world". That moment fueled Bean’s mission to ensure educators exist for the learner, not for their own egos.

Learning as a capability, not an episode

We’re living in an era where the most powerful attribute a graduate can possess is "the ability to learn for life". In the face of generative AI and rapid innovation, learning can no longer be viewed as a one-time "episode" or a single qualification. Instead, it should be treated as a continuous capability.

"I still kind of despair when I see people chasing a master's degree... as if it is going to be this magic pill they can take," Bean observes. For both individuals and employers, the goal must be to normalize "moving in and out of learning as a normal part of operations". Employers, in particular, must move away from a culture that places the entire burden of reskilling on the employee’s shoulders.

The art of unlearning

To stay relevant, we must also master a skill that feels counterintuitive: unlearning. Bean recalls his past as a "DOS wizard," a set of skills once magical but eventually entirely irrelevant. The barrier to unlearning is often internal; we view the loss of old skills as a failure rather than a milestone of growth.

This requirement for humility and vulnerability is now a "practical capability" for modern leaders. The institutions that struggle most are those built in a "bygone world where there was time to think and pilot and act". Today, when an undergraduate program takes two years to develop, the curriculum might be obsolete by the time the first student walks through the door.

The layered credential ecosystem

Degrees, Bean believes, degrees no longer tell the whole story of learning. In a digital world, a degree is a "static qualification" that needs to be supplemented by a more granular, holistic view of the individual. Bean advocates for a layered tapestry of credentials:

  • Macro credentials: The traditional, trusted degrees that provide a foundation of rigor.
  • Meso credentials: Industry-backed certifications and professional licensures that mark specialized mastery.
  • Micro credentials: Short, sharp, skill-aligned packages of learning that send a dynamic signal to the labor market.
     

This ecosystem allows for "dynamic pathways" where learners can enter and exit the system as needed, evolving instead of waiting years for a single moment of validation.

Shifting the institutional mindset

For education institutions to survive a "crisis of relevance" or a "crisis of revenue," they must look beyond the traditional 18-to-22-year-old demographic. Bean suggests that institutions must stop segmenting "adult learners" as a separate, secondary audience. Instead, the entire system should be designed for "re-entry, not just for completion".

This shift requires a "systems-level approach" that includes:

  1. Shared skill descriptors: Building a common digital language for skills to take the friction out of the hiring process.
  2. Equity-first design: Using lifelong models to open access to those historically excluded from traditional education.
  3. Recognition of prior learning (RPL): Moving away from a mindset of "skeptical and untrusting" assessment and toward "assuming competence, not deficit".

The learning journey in 2036

Looking ahead to the next decade, Bean envisions a world where personalization is finally realized through technology. By 2035, every learner will likely have a "personal learning agent" that identifies gaps and guides decisions across all devices. The ultimate currency will be a "living learning portfolio" — a 360-degree digital wallet that is expressible, discoverable, and verifiable. In this future, he predicts educators will let go of outdated, high-stakes exams in favor of assessments that actually enrich the learner. By aligning funding with these connected, lifelong systems, we can make every step a celebration, rather than characterizing every pause as a failure.

"I'll see you in 2035 to see how I did," Bean concludes with a smile. Until then, the challenge for us all is to keep learning, unlearning, and relearning.

Listen to the full conversation on the Educast3000 podcast

About the Author

Sr. Manager, Content Marketing, Instructure

Marianne Chrisos is the Sr. Manager, Content Marketing at Instructure, where she focuses on strategic storytelling and amplifying the voices of educators and learners. With a healthy obsession with how words move people and a lifelong curiosity, she’s excited to share stories and conversations on AI in the classroom, experiential learning, edtech innovation, the science of learning, and creativity across education. She lives and works outside of Chicago, where she spends her free time reading, watching Star Trek, gardening, adopting cats, powerlifting, and getting tattoos.

Like what you learned?

Stay in the know by subscribing to monthly recaps of our news feed.

CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.